Freitag, 10. März 2017

Blog entry 1: Are micropropagated plants genetically identical and stable?

Plant tissue culture or micropropagation has become a very important method to regenerate genetic identical clones of a plant in vitro and can result in preserving valuable genetic resources of threatened species. A problem in this process can be somaclonal variation among the clones. 

Picture 1: in vitro propagation of an orchid (B.Giger, 07.03.17)

The conventional way to prove the true-to-type nature of a clonal plant

RAPD (randomly amplified polymorphic DNA) and ISSR (inter simple sequence repeat) are the conventional methods to analyse the genetic stability of the generated plants. In these processes, the genomic DNA of the donor plant and the in vitro raised plants are compared to each other. (Saha et al., 2016)

Mass propagation of Gloriosa superba as a promising technique

The colchicine alkaloid contained in the tubers and seeds of G. superba has medical features and is antimitotically active. Due to the various usage, the plants containing colchicine are being exploited by many parties. This over-exploitation combined with the poor propagation of G. superba and its sensitivity to many pests are threatening to the species. Through mass propagation, it is possible to generate numerous new individuals of the species in a short time and thus cover the high demand of the plant and possibly save an endangered species. Genetic fidelity is very important, because especially for commercial use the generated plants mustn’t show any unwanted variations but should rather be homogenous to guarantee a certain standard of quality. (Yadav, Aggarwal, & Singh, 2013)

Terms

somaclonal variants
Somaclonal variants have their origin in in vitro cell and tissue culture. Normally, when cells ore tissue is amplified, the goal is to generate clones identical to the original cells or tissue. However, there can occur spontaneous genetic variability in the cultured cells and therefore, there are differences shown among the clones. The variations can be phenotypic or genotypic. (Orton, 1982)
PCR and amplification
PCR is short for polymerase chain reaction. It is a method used to synthesize a new strand of DNA, which is complementary to the original strand. This is possible by using DNA polymerase, which can add nucleotides to already existing 3’-OH-groups with the help of a primer. In the end, the synthesized DNA sequence can be multiplied various times and therefore is an amplification of the pre-existing DNA strands. (NCBI, 2014)
Primer
As mentioned above, the primers are needed for the polymerase chain reaction. It leads the DNA polymerase to the right place on the template strand, where it can begin the synthesis of new DNA nucleotides from the end of the primer.(NCBI, 2014)
Genetic markers
Genetic markers are alleles, which produce visibly different phenotypes and therefore their presence in an organism can be easily detected. (Griffiths et al., 2000)

Is the proposed method save enough to prove genetic fidelity of clonal propagated plants?


The assessment of genetic stability of micropropagated plant like G. superba through RAPD and ISSR analysis provides important information for the successful propagation of genetically identical and stable plants for commercial use. (Yadav et al., 2013)

References
Griffiths AJF, Miller JH, Suzuki DT, et al. An Introduction to Genetic Analysis. 7th edition. New York: W. H. Freeman; 2000. Mapping with molecular markers. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21962/
NCBI. (2014). Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Retrieved 10 March 2017, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/probe/docs/techpcr/
Orton, T. J. (1982). Somaclonal variation. California Agriculture, 8, 20–21.
Saha, S., Adhikari, S., Dey, T., & Ghosh, P. (2016). RAPD and ISSR based evaluation of genetic stability of micropropagated plantlets of Morus alba L. variety S-1. Meta Gene, 7, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mgene.2015.10.004
Yadav, K., Aggarwal, A., & Singh, N. (2013). Evaluation of genetic fidelity among micropropagated plants of Gloriosa superba L. using DNA-based markers — a potential medicinal plant. Fitoterapia, 89, 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2013.06.009

4 Kommentare:

  1. Hi Bettina.
    Reading your post was quite informative. You managed it, to answer the questions in a detailed and precise but still short way. Only regarding the last question in my opinion you missed it to give an exact answer. The sources you found to prove your statements seem reliable. The layout of your post including the picture you added made it very inviting to read your post. Summing up I find you did a good job!

    AntwortenLöschen
  2. Hi
    It's nice that you've used a picture in you blog, makes it a lot more appealing to read. The short intoduction gives a good access to the topic with emphasis on the main problem: variation in clones.
    Furthermore I found it slik that you did not only explain the different terms but also associated them.
    For me you could have gone deeper in the explanation of ISSR and RAPD.

    Kind regards,
    Sandra

    AntwortenLöschen
  3. Hi Bettina, I'm impressed of your blog. Except of the last point it is quite good. ISSR an RAPD appear to be the conventional method (may be in short they will be but no now). In plant breeding and production the most conventional methods are cultivating them in vivo to control genetic fidelity. Concerning compounds in plant material such as colchicine this method is more complex and of course time consuming too. Cheers Hansuredi

    AntwortenLöschen
  4. ... and now this: your blog shows a nice picture of in vitro - orchids. If you'd like to change it: Elena has a couple of iv-propagated Gloriosa in her lab. Just ask ;-). Hansruedi

    AntwortenLöschen